/

Bangladesh: Media Under Yunus’ Grip

Yunus’s administration exemplifies the very archetype of a “banana republic,” wherein governance is dictated by foreign interference and domestic complicity.

2 mins read
Dr Muhammad Yunus in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on Wednesday, March 6, 2024. Photographer: Fabeha Monir/Bloomberg

The mass media in Bangladesh, comprising print, broadcast, and digital platforms, nominally operates under the constitutional guarantee of press freedom. Yet, the ground reality is far removed from this ideal. Freedom of expression, a vital pillar of democracy and civic engagement, has been gradually eroded, reducing the media to a tool for disseminating selective narratives.

This principle, essential for an informed populace to engage in decision-making, has long been championed by human rights organisations and activists. The Internet, a potent medium for the rapid exchange of ideas across linguistic and geographic boundaries, has similarly faced restrictions under the current regime. Dr. Muhammad Yunus and his coterie, entrenched in an administration rife with duplicity, claim to champion these freedoms, but the reality is entirely antithetical.

Radio stations, television channels, and other outlets churn out content dictated by shadowy interests aligned with the puppet government under Yunus. These broadcasts favour extremist factions, including the Jamaat-e-Islami, infamous for their atrocities during 1971, and their ideological heirs. Moreover, organisations such as Hefazat-e-Islam, Hizb ut-Tahrir, and Ansarullah Bangla Team have grown increasingly emboldened, establishing an environment of pervasive fear and oppression since the ousting of HPM Sheikh Hasina on 5 August 2024.

Under the veneer of this regime lies a deeply entrenched culture of censorship. Journalists and editors operate within an atmosphere of self-imposed restraint, compelled by the ever-present spectre of retribution from violent actors and state apparatuses. The few who attempt to reveal the unvarnished truth are met with threats, persecution, or worse, as the media is systematically neutered under Yunus’s administration.

This assault on press freedom marks an unparalleled nadir in Bangladesh’s history. A nation born of bloodshed and sacrifice in 1971, with the unwavering support of India and the Soviet Union, now finds itself in the grip of a regime that undermines its very foundations. Under Yunus, the legacy of the Awami League, the party that spearheaded the independence movement, is systematically dismantled, while its supporters endure relentless harassment.

Despite the constitutional guarantees, the authorities frequently obstruct access to digital platforms and online spaces whenever they expose the regime’s malfeasance. The murder of outspoken bloggers critical of religious fundamentalism serves as a grim reminder of the peril faced by those who challenge the status quo. Meanwhile, the sinister collusion between Yunus’s administration and foreign powers, including Pakistan’s ISI, underscores the depth of betrayal against the ideals of 1971.

Dr. Yunus’s regime, propped up by powerful Western allies, has brought Bangladesh to a precipice of socio-political chaos. The population suffers under soaring prices and unchecked violence, with minorities and political opponents bearing the brunt of this disorder. Murders, rapes, and pogroms targeting Awami League supporters and Hindu communities are on the rise, while the regime clings to power through an alliance of coercion and complicity.

The country’s media, once a bastion of spirited debate and critique, has been reduced to a mouthpiece for the regime’s agenda. Even traditionally critical outlets, such as The Daily Star and Prothom Alo, have been silenced under the threat of mob violence orchestrated by extremist factions. Despite glaring evidence of this decay, the international human rights community remains conspicuously silent, having vociferously condemned Sheikh Hasina’s government in the past.

Yunus’s administration exemplifies the very archetype of a “banana republic,” wherein governance is dictated by foreign interference and domestic complicity. The Fourth Estate, which ought to hold power to account, now stands compromised, with many journalists lamenting the profession’s decline from its once-noble ideals of integrity and impartiality.

The present state of Bangladesh, characterised by mob rule, economic despair, and the erosion of civil liberties, is a stark warning to democracies everywhere. If the country’s media and civil society fail to rise against this tyranny, Bangladesh risks losing the very essence of the freedom it fought so valiantly to achieve in 1971. History will not absolve those who allowed this travesty to unfold unchallenged.

Anwar A. Khan

Anwar A. Khan is an independent political analyst based in Dhaka, Bangladesh who writes on politics, political and human-centred figures, current and international affairs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from Blog