/

India Orders Social Media to Remove Illegal Content Within Three Hours

New rule sharply shortens compliance window from 36 hours, raising concerns over feasibility, censorship, and the future of online regulation in the world’s largest digital market.

1 min read
Prime Minister Narendra Modi with National Security Adviser Ajit Doval

India has announced that social media platforms must remove unlawful content within three hours of receiving official notice, dramatically tightening a previous 36-hour deadline in a move that could significantly challenge major technology companies such as Meta, YouTube, and X. The revised regulation, which amends the country’s 2021 Information Technology rules, will take effect on February 20 and further cements India’s reputation as one of the most assertive governments globally in policing online content.

The government did not provide a formal explanation for the shortened timeline, but the change arrives amid ongoing friction between Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration and global technology firms over issues of content moderation, legal accountability, and platform responsibility. With more than one billion internet users, India represents one of the largest and most critical markets for social media companies, making compliance both essential and operationally complex.

Legal experts say the new three-hour window may be difficult to implement in practice. Technology lawyer Akash Karmakar described the requirement as “practically impossible” for companies to meet, arguing that such a short timeframe leaves little room for review, verification, or legal assessment before content is removed. Critics warn that the rule could compel platforms to err on the side of immediate takedown, potentially leading to over-censorship.

India has steadily expanded its authority over digital speech in recent years, empowering numerous government officials to issue removal orders for content deemed illegal under laws covering national security, public order, and other statutory provisions. This has led to repeated clashes with technology companies and criticism from digital rights advocates who fear the measures may restrict freedom of expression.

Transparency disclosures illustrate the scale of enforcement already underway. Platforms have received thousands of takedown directives, with Meta alone reporting that it restricted more than 28,000 pieces of content in India during the first half of 2025 in response to government requests. Industry representatives say the latest rule was introduced without meaningful consultation and departs from international norms that typically allow longer compliance timelines.

The regulatory shift comes as governments worldwide, from Europe to Latin America, push social media companies to act more quickly against harmful or illegal material, placing India within a broader global trend toward stricter digital oversight. At the same time, the country’s amendments softened an earlier proposal on artificial intelligence transparency. Instead of requiring AI-generated content to carry labels across a fixed portion of a post or video, platforms must now ensure such material is prominently identified.

Major companies have so far offered limited public reaction. Meta declined to comment, while X and Google, which operates YouTube, did not immediately respond to inquiries. As the February implementation date approaches, the new rule is expected to test the balance between regulatory control and the operational realities of moderating content at massive scale, potentially shaping how governments worldwide approach digital governance.

Sri Lanka Guardian

The Sri Lanka Guardian is an online web portal founded in August 2007 by a group of concerned Sri Lankan citizens including journalists, activists, academics and retired civil servants. We are independent and non-profit. Email: editor@slguardian.org

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from Blog