Venezuela’s National Assembly has approved the first discussion of a major judicial reform that would significantly expand the country’s Supreme Court, a move authorities claim will accelerate legal proceedings and improve institutional responsiveness. The proposal focuses on modifying Article 8 of the Organic Law of the Supreme Court of Justice, increasing the number of magistrates from 20 to 32 in an effort to address delays and strengthen the system’s capacity.
Under the plan, each of the five ordinary chambers of the court would grow from three to five judges, while the Constitutional Chamber would expand from five to seven members. Lawmakers backing the reform argue that a larger composition will allow the court to process cases more efficiently and respond more effectively to public demands for timely justice.
National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez, who presided over the vote, described the initiative as part of a broader transformation of Venezuela’s judicial system. He stressed that the reform aims to enhance speed, plurality, and institutional effectiveness, and noted that it is being developed through dialogue and consultation as part of ongoing efforts to update the penal framework. He also emphasized the importance of building consensus on issues of national interest, even as political differences persist.
During the parliamentary debate, officials rejected accusations that the justice system penalizes dissent, defending state actions against what they described as conduct that violates civic norms. Rodríguez argued that confronting misinformation and extremist narratives is necessary while maintaining a commitment to national stability and institutional order.
Other lawmakers highlighted additional goals tied to the reform, including reducing the length of trials and strengthening oversight mechanisms within the judiciary. Proposals were also raised to expand the role of the General Inspectorate of Courts and to review related legal frameworks governing judicial training and supervision.
Despite government assurances, opposition figures have voiced concern that expanding the number of magistrates could increase political influence over the judiciary. Critics argue that structural changes of this magnitude require broader national consensus and safeguards to ensure judicial independence.
The reform will now be sent to the Permanent Commission of Interior Policy for technical evaluation before returning to the assembly for final approval, marking a crucial next step in what could become a defining shift in Venezuela’s legal system.
