Former State Intelligence Service chief and retired Major General Suresh Sallay has been admitted to Ward 7 of the National Hospital after reportedly suffering a sudden illness while in detention at the Criminal Investigation Department. His hospitalization comes amid growing controversy surrounding allegations against him, which his legal team has strongly denied.
A lawyer representing Sallay stated that despite repeated requests, both family members and legal counsel have been denied permission to visit him or assess his medical condition. The refusal has raised concerns over transparency and due process, with the defense emphasizing that even basic access to verify his health status has not been granted by authorities.
The developments coincide with strong remarks from President’s Counsel and former Foreign Minister Ali Sabry, who rejected all allegations against Sallay as baseless. He described the claims as a “blatant lie” and dismissed the broader accusations as politically motivated, insisting there is no evidence linking the former intelligence chief to any wrongdoing.
Sabri also criticized the conduct of the ongoing investigation, alleging undue interference by a prominent religious figure and questioning the credibility of those leading the probe. He pointed to investigator Shani Abeysekara, noting that previous commission findings had recommended legal action against him, thereby casting doubt on the integrity of the inquiry.
Responding to claims that past attacks were part of a conspiracy to secure political advantage, Sabry dismissed the theory as illogical. He argued that the political direction of the country had already been established well before such events, making such allegations both unnecessary and implausible.
Expressing disappointment over the situation, Sabry announced his decision to withdraw from politics, stating that he would continue serving the country through his legal profession. As Sallay remains hospitalized under restricted access, the case continues to intensify debate over accountability, political influence, and the credibility of one of Sri Lanka’s most sensitive investigations.
