/

In Bangladesh Democracy Was Not the Goal

Inside the engineered collapse of Bangladesh’s elected government

4 mins read
On a foggy morning, a woman carries brinjals to Marma Bazar Ghat in Bandarban, 10 December 2025. [Photo: Mong Hai Shing Marma/Prothom Alo]

Bangladesh now finds itself trapped in an unforgiving crossfire, ensnared by the American deep state’s geopolitical and economic machinations. What was once a nation steadily forging its path as a sovereign, democratic state is today caught in a whirlwind of manipulation and subversion, where external agendas and domestic collusion have converged to erode both governance and public trust. Tragically, Bangladesh—and its founding party, the Awami League—have become unwilling casualties in this turbulent geopolitical storm.

The events of 5 August 2024 mark a vicious watershed moment, a dark turning point in the country’s history. What unfolded on that fateful day was neither a spontaneous democratic correction nor an organic popular uprising; it was a calculated and meticulously orchestrated regime change. It represented a convergence of foreign intervention and domestic betrayal, engineered to undermine leadership that had propelled Bangladesh towards stability and progress.

The American deep state, led by the CIA and operating in collusion with Pakistan’s most extremist networks, found willing collaborators within the country: Dr Muhammad Yunus; the Jamaati–Shibir nexus—the ideological heirs of 1971; the BNP, deeply entrenched within the Dhaka cantonment; and a motley alliance of far-right fundamentalists, repackaged for what some analysts describe as the CIA’s “Model 2024” experiment. Together, they dismantled the government of Bangladesh’s most successful Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina, replacing it with a puppet administration devoid of legitimacy, vision, and moral authority.

Since that day, Bangladesh has been bleeding in every sense—politically, socially, economically, and morally. Extremist rule is inherently ill-suited to governance; it lacks foresight, compassion, and wisdom. The country now faces the spectres of civil unrest, famine, and a collapse of public confidence, all under the heavy hand of an illegitimate, externally influenced administration led by Dr Yunus and his feared “mango-twigs”. Every citizen is called upon to awaken to the reality of this crisis: to uphold freedom, reject extremism, and reclaim the promise of a sovereign, peaceful, and prosperous Bangladesh.

Geopolitics is often described as a chessboard upon which great powers manoeuvre for advantage. For smaller nations like Bangladesh, however, it is far more than a game; it is a silent, ruthless war with immediate and tangible consequences. Strategically positioned at the crossroads of South and South-East Asia, Bangladesh has become a coveted prize in a broader struggle for influence. Its sovereignty is perpetually scrutinised, every independent policy decision viewed with suspicion, and acts of national self-determination reframed as hostility or defiance.

The Awami League—the architect of Bangladesh’s independence and the guardian of its secular, constitutional foundations—now stands under relentless pressure from these invisible forces. Its commitment to sovereignty, regional cooperation, and economic self-reliance clashes with foreign agendas that prioritise control over partnership. Powerful actors, cloaked in the rhetoric of democracy and human rights, manipulate narratives, impose sanctions, and quietly engineer destabilisation. In such an environment, genuine governance and developmental achievement are persistently undermined.

Indeed, Bangladesh’s remarkable socio-economic progress over recent decades under the able and dynamic leadership of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina—rising per capita income, women’s empowerment, digital transformation, and rapid infrastructure development—has been overshadowed in global discourse by reductive labels such as “contested democracy”, “frontline state”, or “swing nation” in the Indo-Pacific rivalry. In geopolitics, control over narratives has become a potent weapon, eroding public trust and weakening legitimate governance. Achievement is minimised while instability is amplified, all to serve external interests rather than national welfare.

This is neo-colonialism in a subtler form. The tanks and gunboats of the past have been replaced by so-called think tanks, NGOs, engineered regime changes, and carefully curated narratives. Reform imposed from abroad cannot substitute for home-grown solutions. Political progress must emerge organically, rooted in local realities, constitutional processes, and the will of the people. The stakes could not be higher. Bangladesh, a nation of 170 million, now faces existential threats; political instability here reverberates far beyond its borders, affecting regional peace, democracy, and human rights.

Bangladesh and the Awami League today stand as emblematic victims of the silent suffering imposed on smaller nations by the machinations of global power. Their predicament reflects a broader truth: in a world dominated by great-power rivalry, sovereignty is conditional and national agency is constantly tested. Until the international order recognises and respects the autonomy of vulnerable nations, geopolitics will remain less a rational strategy than a silent war, exacting disproportionate costs from those caught in its crossfire.

This moment calls for clarity, courage, and collective conscience. Citizens must recognise the forces at work, reject destabilisation, and demand a return to governance that is accountable, legitimate, and firmly anchored in the national interest. The promise of Bangladesh—born of the blood and sacrifice of 1971—remains alive, but it demands vigilance, moral courage, and decisive action to protect it.

Bangladesh’s journey illustrates the hidden cost of geopolitics: even nations that have achieved remarkable progress, even liberation movements that embody the soul of their country, can become collateral damage when external interests and domestic opportunists converge. The test of our time is not merely survival, but the ability to reclaim sovereignty, reaffirm democratic principles, and restore national dignity.

Bangladesh has endured much, and its people have demonstrated remarkable resilience. Yet the path ahead requires heightened awareness of the invisible forces shaping national destiny. Only through vigilance, unity, and the courage to confront both domestic betrayal and foreign subversion can Bangladesh navigate this crossfire and emerge stronger, truly sovereign, and justly governed.

If the American establishment were to refrain from interfering in the internal affairs of sovereign nations, and abandon its calculated pursuit of regime change driven by narrow self-interest, an estimated 98 per cent of the wars, armed conflicts, drone strikes, missile attacks, and other manifestations of geopolitical violence afflicting countries across the world would all but disappear. The world would become a far safer and more harmonious place for humanity to coexist in peace. As for the remaining two per cent of disruptions, they would wither away of their own accord, rendered powerless in the absence of foreign-instigated turmoil.

Anwar A. Khan

Anwar A. Khan is an independent political analyst based in Dhaka, Bangladesh who writes on politics, political and human-centred figures, current and international affairs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Latest from Blog

Mecca Draws a New Line

The Mecca Accord, signed in August 2026 by Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Pakistan, represents a striking