/

Not All Mass Shootings Are the Same

Ideology, Firearms, and Security Failure in Sydney and Providence

2 mins read
Father of two Ahmed al Ahmed in St George Hospital recovering from his bullet wounds after tackling the alleged gunman in Bondi on Sunday night

Two mass-casualty incidents occurring on December 13-14, 2025, on opposite sides of the globe underscore the fundamentally complex and divergent threat environments confronting national security and law enforcement agencies worldwide. While the terrorist attack in Sydney, Australia, on December 14, represents a manifestation of internationally-linked, ideologically driven jihadist violence with discernible operational and geographic antecedents, the shooting at Brown University in the United States (US) reflects the persistent challenge of domestic gun violence,

On December 14, Australian authorities declared a terrorist attack following a mass shooting at Sydney’s Bondi Beach during a Hanukkah celebration attended by several hundred people. Two attackers – according to news reports, a 50-year-old Pakistan origin father Sajid Akram, and his 24-year-old son Naveed Akram – opened fire on the crowd. Home Minister Tony Burke confirmed that “the son is an Australian-born citizen, while the father arrived in 1998 on a student visa, which was transferred in 2001 to a partner visa and later resident return visas” without confirming the country of origin of the father. 16 people were killed, including one of the assailants, and at least another 43 were injured. Investigators recovered multiple firearms and improvised explosive devices from a vehicle linked to the attackers, confirming a level of preparation exceeding that seen in most lone-actor attacks. The attack stands as the second-deadliest mass shooting in Australian history. The worst mass shooting incident in Australian history remains the Port Arthur massacre of April 28, 1996, in Tasmania, where a lone gunman killed 35 people and injured 23, an event that fundamentally reshaped Australia’s gun control framework through sweeping legislative reforms. The Port Arthur killer Martin Bryant used two semi-automatic rifles. Though Police is “unable to confirm” the specifics of the weapons used by the Bondi Beach perpetrators, reports claim that they used hunting-style bolt action rifles.

Authorities confirmed that the Jewish community was the intended target at Bondi Beach, establishing the attack as a case of religiously motivated terrorism. The older attacker was a legally licensed firearms owner with six registered weapons, enabling sustained firepower. The use of multiple attackers, combined with firearms and explosives (two improvised explosive devices were recovered and defused), marks a significant tactical escalation in Australia’s domestic security landscape.

Significantly, Naveed Akram had previously been under investigation by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation for six months in 2019 due to associations with individuals of security concern, though he was subsequently assessed as posing no ongoing threat. This “known but not disrupted” profile reflects a recurrent vulnerability in counterterrorism frameworks globally, where individuals flagged in intelligence systems later re-emerge as active perpetrators.

In contrast, the December 13 shooting at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, aligns with well-documented patterns of domestic gun violence in the US. A lone gunman opened fire during a final exam review session, killing two students and injuring nine. The campus was placed under lockdown for several hours, and all remaining examinations were cancelled. The suspect remains at large, and authorities have not identified ideological motivations or links to organized extremist networks.

The weapon reportedly used in the Brown University incident was a handgun, consistent with data indicating that handguns are involved in approximately 73 per cent of mass shootings in the US. Unlike the Sydney attack, there was no indication of coordinated action, use of explosives, or advance operational planning. The incident reflects a recurrent domestic security challenge rather than a transnational terrorist threat.

Statistical trends further contextualize the divergence between these incidents. While mass shootings in the US have remained a persistent phenomenon, most result in comparatively lower casualty counts and lack ideological drivers. Indeed, according to Gun Violence Archive, US has witnessed at least 5,582 mass shooting incidents since 2014, including 392 in 2025 ((data till December 14, 2025). Open media sources claim that only around 12 of these incidents recorded more than 10 fatalities.

High-casualty terrorist attacks, such as the one in Sydney, remain relatively rare but pose disproportionately complex challenges due to their planning depth, target selection, and potential external support networks. Australia has recorded five mass shooting incidents, other than the Bondi Beach and Port Arthur killings.

Both the Providence and Sydney incidents overwhelmed local emergency response systems, indicating that, despite their fairly long global history, few administrations are prepared for mass casualty assaults, and few communities immune to the profound societal trauma they inflict.

Ajit Kumar Singh

Ajit Kumar Singh, is a Research Fellow at the Institute for Conflict Management

Latest from Blog